Avaliação da Ontologia Criminal Dirigida por Humanos
Abstract
Ontology refers to a set of fundamental concepts and relationships, able to identify how people interpret the situation. In the field of risk management, ontology provides the development of inference models that assist in the perception and construction of better decision-making in critical situations, especially when they relate to areas that involve lives human, environmental and heritage. However, ways to evaluate the characteristics of the classes, properties, axioms, efficiency and objectivity of the ontologies are necessary to ensure a better representativeness of the information, and also, if it is fulfilling the ontological commitment And clearly transparently the information related to the domain to which it belongs. This article aims to present the process of evaluation of the human-driven ontology Brazilian crime ontology, in order to ascertain the fulfillment of its objectives related to the criminal domain, specifically in the semantic construction of crime situations, in case of robbery and theft.
The (A) Assignor declares that (s) text (s) concerned is (are) of his personal authorship, being responsible, therefore, for the originality of the (s) even (s) and gives the organizers, full rights to choice of publisher, publication means, means of reproduction, dissemination of media, drawing, shape, everything that is needed for that publication be effected.
PUBLISHER undertakes to ensure the editorial quality of the publication, ensuring that the concepts and the thought of (a) ASSIGNOR remain faithful to the original. This assignment will be valid throughout the period of legal protection WORK, may hold the PUBLISHER will be shown how many issues it deems appropriate.
All rights are reserved. Any reproduction, even if part of the publication should include the reference credit, according to the current copyright law of Brazil. Still, the article submission process, the author agrees to the terms of an exclusive statement, originality and agreement to the final version. It is justified in the field "; COMMENTS TO THE EDITOR" ;, when the participation of more than one author.
